The Righteous Mind Review

I know you have heard about the righteous mind book and you want information on it.Right?
You want to find out what it is and what it can do for you. Well, you are at the right place because i am here for you.
I will take you through what it is, table of contents ,lessons from the book, cost and my thoughts about the book.
I will try all my best to give you every single detail about the righteous mind and if by any chance i do not  tackle one of the things you really wanted,you can as well ask in the comments area and i will be happy to help you out .
Lets get started on the the righteous mind book review:
Summary
Name : The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided By Religion And Politics
Best Place to Buy: www.amazon.com
Author: Jonathan Haidt
Subject: Social Psychology
Language: English
Publisher :  Vintage
Date : February 12,2013
Pages: 528
What It Is
This is a social psychology book by Jonathan Haidt, in which the author describes human morality as it relates to politics and religion.
As America descends deeper into polarization and paralysis, social psychologist Jonathan Haidt has done the seemingly impossible—challenged conventional thinking about morality, politics, and religion in a way that speaks to everyone on the political spectrum.
Drawing on his twenty five years of groundbreaking research on moral psychology, he shows how moral judgments arise not from reason but from gut feelings.
He shows why liberals, conservatives, and libertarians have such different intuitions about right and wrong, and he shows why each side is actually right about many of its central concerns.
In this book, Haidt gives you the key to understanding the miracle of human cooperation, as well as the curse of our eternal divisions and conflicts.
Jonathan David Haidt  born October 19, 1963 is an American social psychologist and Professor of Ethical Leadership at New York University ‘s Stern School of Business .
His academic specialization is the psychology of morality and the moral emotions.
Haidt is the author of two books: The Happiness Hypothesis: Finding Modern Truth in Ancient Wisdom (2006) and The Righteous Mind : Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion (2012), which became a New York Times bestseller.
He was named one of the “top global thinkers” by Foreign Policy magazine, and one of the “top world thinkers” by Prospect magazine.
Table of Contents Of This Book
i. Introduction/Synopsis
PART I: THE BIOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS OF MORALITY
1. An Introduction to the Biological Foundations of Morality

2. Moral Intuition

3. Tracking Down The Biological Foundations of Morality
4. The Six Moral Modules
a. The Care/Harm Module
b. The Fairness/Cheating Module
c. The Loyalty/Betrayal Module
d. The Authority/Subversion Module
e. The Liberty/Oppression Module
f. The Sanctity Module
5. Human Groupishness, The Hive Switch & Religion
6. Groupishness and the Question of Group Selection
PART II: HOW THE BIOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS OF MORALITY ARE MODIFIED BY INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL FACTORS
7. Individualistic Vs. Sociocentric Cultures
8. The Right and the Left in the West
9. Explaining the Rift Between the Right and the Left
a. Leftist and Rightist Personality Traits
b. Leftist and Rightist Views of Human Nature
PART III: THE POLITICAL DEBATE
10. Two Points for the Left
11. Two Points for the Right

12. Conclusion

Lessons From This Book
Morality binds and blinds. It binds us into ideological teams that fight each other as though the fate of the world depended on our side winning each battle. It blinds us to the fact that each team is composed of good people who have something important to say.
If you think that moral reasoning is something we do to figure out the truth, you’ll be constantly frustrated by how foolish, biased, and illogical people become when they disagree with you.
Anyone who values truth should stop worshipping reason.
Intuitions come first, strategic reasoning second.
When a group of people make something sacred, the members of the cult lose the ability to think clearly about it.
We should not expect individuals to produce good, open-minded, truth- seeking reasoning, particularly when self- interest or reputational concerns are in play.
But if you put individuals together in the right way, such that some individuals can use their reasoning powers to disconfirm the claims of others, and all individuals feel some common bond or shared fate that allows them to interact civilly, you can create a group that ends up producing good reasoning as an emergent property of the social system. This is why it’s so important to have intellectual and ideological diversity within any group or institution whose goal is to find truth (such as an intelligence agency or a community of scientists) or to produce good public policy (such as a legislature or advisory board).
The human mind is a story processor, not a logic processor.
If you grow up in a weird society, you become so well educated in the ethic of autonomy that you can detect oppression and inequality even where the apparent victims see nothing wrong.
People bind themselves into political teams that share moral narratives. Once they accept a particular narrative, they become blind to alternative moral worlds.
The social intuitionist model offers an explanation of why moral and political arguments are so frustrating: because moral reasons are the tail wagged by the intuitive dog. A dog’s tail wags to communicate. You can’t make a dog happy by forcibly wagging its tail. And you can’t change people’s minds by utterly refuting their arguments.
Understanding the simple fact that morality differs around the world, and even within societies, is the first step toward understanding your righteous mind.
The “omnivore’s dilemma” (a term coined by Paul Rozin) is that omnivores must seek out and explore new potential foods while remaining wary of them until they are proven safe. Omnivores therefore go through life with two competing motives: neophilia (an attraction to new things) and neophobia (a fear of new things). People vary in terms of which motive is stronger. Liberals score higher on measures of neophilia (also known as “openness to experience”), not just for new foods but also for new people, music, and ideas. Conservatives are higher on neophobia; they prefer to stick with what’s tried and true, and they care a lot more about guarding borders, boundaries, and traditions.
People who devote their lives to studying something often come to believe that the object of their fascination is the key to understanding everything.

Best Place to Buy The Book

The best place I recommend you buy the book is on Amazon. The price there is fair and according to my research, it is the most trusted online store at the moment. It will also be very convenient for you to buy there if you were planning to do more online shopping today.

My Thoughts
This is a good and well written book ,however the subject of the book would only be interesting to people interested in politics,religion and human nature.
Conclusion
Feel free to leave in your comments as well
as your questions.
I hope you found this review useful to you.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *